Finished up drilling, deburring, and countersinking the parts for the F-706 bulkhead.

There are some flush rivets on the front of the bulkhead. The bulkhead in theory is thin enough to dimple. However, there are various parts behind it. Some could be dimpled, some would have to be countersunk, and there are 3 layers in some places. To make things easier, I just countersunk the bulkhead and F-730 where needed.
I also had to nibble away at the F-730 and the forward flange of the bellcrank channel and rib for the snap bushings. Todd Moeller suggested a Dremel bit to me a long time ago, and I finally had an opportunity to use it. It rocked. It only took a few minutes each to Dremel, file and then sand the cut outs.

I have two edge distance issues that I’m concerned with, so I wrote to Van’s about it. The first is on the F-705 bulkhead. I cut and positioned the bar doublers as per the plans, but the holes at the very inboard tips of the F-605C bar doublers came very close to the edge. The edge distance is 3/16″ instead of 1/4″.

[Van’s reply:
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 4:45 AM
Subject: RE: Question about edge distances
Dave,
You have made a common error on the doublers for the 705
bulkhead. The edge distance is marginal, but you can keep the
parts. The plane will not self destruct. Carry on and be careful.
Bruce Reynolds]
The second issue is on the F-706 bulkhead. I fabricated all of the angle parts per the plans and clecoed all of the parts together. When I drilled the F-729C angle to the F-729B angle, the hole on the top of the F-729B angle is very close to the edge, about 3/32″ edge distance to the center of the hole.

[Edit: I asked Julie to take a look at this second problem. A second set of eyes always helps. When I marked the position for the hole in the F-729C angle, I measured from the wrong side of the angle. Simple mistake that had a cascade effect. I’ll fabricate new angles.]
We’ll see what they say. I don’t think either is a major issue, but it’s better to check with the experts.